linux-kernel - Re: move the arm arch_dma_alloc implementation to common code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181127073715.GA30033@lst.de>
Date:   Tue, 27 Nov 2018 08:37:15 +0100
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:     Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
Cc:     Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Guo Ren <ren_guo@...ky.com>,
        Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: move the arm arch_dma_alloc implementation to common code

On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 12:58:04PM -0800, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 2018-11-15 11:50 am, Will Deacon wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 08:52:38AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>> Can I get a quick review from the arm64 folks?  I think it should
>>> be fine there as it basically is a code move, but an additional pair
>>> or two of eyes always helps to weed out bugs.
>>
>> I reviewed the arm64 parts, but it would be ideal if Robin could have a look
>> as well.
>
> Yup, from a quick skim the general shape of the whole series looks 
> pleasing, but I've been holding off going through it in detail until I've 
> figured out what's up with the last thing I thought I'd reviewed 
> exhaustively...
>
> Either way I'll make some time for a proper look next week once I'm back.

Did you get a chance to look over this?