[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181127084605.GY2113@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2018 09:46:05 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, julia@...com, jeyu@...nel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] x86/static_call: Add inline static call
implementation for x86-64
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 02:14:49PM -0600, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 10:28:08AM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > Can you add a comment that it will need updating when kernel CET is added?
>
> Will do, though I get the feeling there's a lot of other (existing) code
> that will also need to change for kernel CET.
Yeah, function graph tracer and kretprobes at the very least. But I
suspect there's a few surprises to be hand once they try kernel CET.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists