[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181127084929.GC16047@rkaganb.sw.ru>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2018 08:49:33 +0000
From: Roman Kagan <rkagan@...tuozzo.com>
To: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
CC: "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"Michael Kelley (EOSG)" <Michael.H.Kelley@...rosoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] x86/kvm/hyper-v: avoid open-coding
stimer_mark_pending() in kvm_hv_notify_acked_sint()
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 04:47:32PM +0100, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> stimers_pending optimization only helps us to avoid multiple
> kvm_make_request() calls. This doesn't happen very often and these
> calls are very cheap in the first place, remove open-coded version of
> stimer_mark_pending() from kvm_hv_notify_acked_sint().
Frankly speaking, I've yet to see a guest that configures more than one
SynIC timer. So it was indeed a bit of overengineering in the first
place.
> Suggested-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c | 12 +++---------
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Roman Kagan <rkagan@...tuozzo.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists