[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181127090344.qlrksisbbmcjm3ac@flea>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2018 10:03:44 +0100
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>
To: Brian Starkey <Brian.Starkey@....com>
Cc: Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@...tlin.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com" <linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>, nd <nd@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 31/43] drm/sun4i: Add a dedicated ioctl call for
allocating tiled buffers
On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 11:30:20AM +0000, Brian Starkey wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 10:25:03AM +0100, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
> >This introduces a dedicated ioctl for allocating buffers for the VPU
> >tiling mode. It allows setting up buffers that comply to the hardware
> >alignment requirements, by aligning the stride and height to 32 bytes.
> >
> >Only YUV semiplanar and planar formats are allowed by the ioctl, as the
> >hardware does not support the tiling mode for other formats.
>
> What's the general feeling about a more generic version of this ioctl?
> There doesn't seem to be anything Allwinner-specific in the ioctl
> arguments.
I'm definitely in favor of having such an ioctl.
maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists