linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] br_netfilter: add struct netns

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181127101906.wzi3sxazxwo5x45h@brauner.io>
Date:   Tue, 27 Nov 2018 11:19:08 +0100
From:   Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>
To:     Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
        coreteam@...filter.org, bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        tyhicks@...onical.com, kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu, fw@...len.de,
        roopa@...ulusnetworks.com, nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] br_netfilter: add struct netns_brnf

On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 09:23:49AM +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 03:20:45AM +0100, Christian Brauner wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 01:20:47AM +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 02:48:58PM +0100, Christian Brauner wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > > diff --git a/include/net/netns/netfilter.h b/include/net/netns/netfilter.h
> > > > index ca043342c0eb..eedbd1ac940e 100644
> > > > --- a/include/net/netns/netfilter.h
> > > > +++ b/include/net/netns/netfilter.h
> > > > @@ -35,4 +35,20 @@ struct netns_nf {
> > > >  	bool			defrag_ipv6;
> > > >  #endif
> > > >  };
> > > > +
> > > > +struct netns_brnf {
> > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL
> > > > +	struct ctl_table_header *ctl_hdr;
> > > > +#endif
> > > > +
> > > > +	/* default value is 1 */
> > > > +	int call_iptables;
> > > > +	int call_ip6tables;
> > > > +	int call_arptables;
> > > > +
> > > > +	/* default value is 0 */
> > > > +	int filter_vlan_tagged;
> > > > +	int filter_pppoe_tagged;
> > > > +	int pass_vlan_indev;
> > > > +};
> > > 
> > > I have spun on this several times, wondering if there's a way to avoid
> > > scratching these many bytes per netns to expose these sysctl entries
> > > that are plain on/off toggles... You said this:
> > > 
> > > >Currently, the /proc/sys/net/bridge folder is only created in the
> > > >initial network namespace
> > > 
> > > I think we can add one single sysctl to expose these as flags from net
> > > namespaces. Idea is to keep the existing (legacy) sysctl entries for
> > > init_net only, and add a new single new one that exposes these as flags
> > > (should be also available for consistency in init_net I'd suggest).
> > > Flags could be map in this way, eg.
> > > 
> > >         0x1     call_iptables
> > >         0x2     call_ip6tables
> > >         0x4     call_arptables
> > >         0x8     filter_vlan_tagged
> > >         ...
> > > 
> > > Also documentation would be good to have for this.
> > > 
> > > Would this idea fly for you? Thanks.
> > 
> > My suggestion is to keep these files per network namespace but have a
> > single flag argument in struct netns_brnf:
> > +struct netns_brnf {
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL
> > +        struct ctl_table_header *ctl_hdr;
> > +#endif
> > +
> > +       /* default value is 1 */
> > +       unsigned int filter_flags;
> > +};
> > 
> > #define BRNF_CALL_IPTABLES    0x1
> > #define BRNF_CALL_IP6TABLES   0x2
> > #define BRNF_CALL_ARPTABLES   0x4
> > #define BRNF_CALL_VLAN_TAGGED 0x8
> > 
> > a write to the corresponding file would then cause the flag to be set or
> > unset in filter_flags.
> > This way we are a) space-efficient internally not bloating struct net
> > while b) not breaking running tools in non-initial network namespaces
> > that expect the files to be there. b) is really the important bit here. :)
> 
> OK, please, go explore this space-efficient approach. Thanks.

Will do. I'll try to get to it in the next couple of days and send out a
new version. Thanks!