[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACT4Y+aeESAk3URSKGDUG4L=awa3X18hypzYzeWjmv-CP2YttQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2018 11:38:47 +0100
From: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
syzbot <syzbot+762a577f56cfb1574647@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Levin, Alexander" <alexander.levin@...izon.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux@...inikbrodowski.net,
Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@...il.com>,
nikolaus.voss@...wensteinmedical.de,
syzkaller-bugs <syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next boot error (2)
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 11:25 AM, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> wrote:
> Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com> wrote:
>
>> Please either use the Reported-by tag (for amended linux-next fixes
>> Tested-by can make more sense and is recognized too), or tell syzbot
>> separately:
>
> It got folded in as that's better than carrying a separate patch.
>
> I'll ask Al how he wants to deal with this since he's carrying the patches
> now.
A similar case in linux-next was discussed recently:
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/syzkaller-bugs/xiSF9GdiikU/uBoyYyf3AQAJ
For such cases it can make more sense to use Tested-by tag instead of
Reported-by to not confuse people that the resulting amended patch
fixes some bug (e.g. stable will try to pick it up). Tested-by is
also recognized by syzbot.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists