linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/5] perf tools: Add fallback functions for cases where cpumode is insufficient

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181126194414.GF18491@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 26 Nov 2018 16:44:14 -0300
From:   Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To:     Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Cc:     Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] perf tools: Add fallback functions for cases where
 cpumode is insufficient

Em Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 04:41:45PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Em Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 04:02:17PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> > Em Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 07:53:17PM +0000, Hunter, Adrian escreveu:
> > > > From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [mailto:acme@...nel.org]
> > > > Em Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 07:21:44PM +0000, Hunter, Adrian escreveu:
> > > > > > > +static bool machine__single_ku_as(struct machine *machine) {
> > > > > > > +	return strcmp(perf_env__arch(machine->env), "sparc"); }
> 
> > > > > > Can we avoid having this strcmp be done repeatedly?
> 
> > > > > It is only done if there are mapping errors
> 
> > > > > > Can we avoid having this strcmp be done repeatedly? I.e. just
> > > > > > make this a boolean initialized at session start, when
> > > > > > machine->env is setup, so we'd have:
> 
> > > > > >    machine->single_address_space
> 
> > > > > > Instead of a function?
> 
> > > > > Sure  thing.
> > 
> > Have you sent an update to this patch series addressing the concerns? I
> > think that renaming that _fb to __fallback and having this
> > machine->single_address_space is what is missing, I'll try to take a
> > stab at this now and have it in my perf/core branch soon.
>  
> > But you have this already done, please send it.
> 
> So, here is the patch on top of yours and at the end a patch that I'm
> inserting just before yours, please check and ack, thanks:


Argh, nevermind, just saw your V2, /me goes to read it ;-\

- Arnaldo