[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a53eb78d-90d3-f84e-a0bf-9acbc32671f4@lightnvm.io>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2018 15:22:01 +0100
From: Matias Bjørling <mb@...htnvm.io>
To: javier@...xlabs.com, suhua.tanke@...il.com
Cc: axboe@...nel.dk, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lightnvm: pblk: adjust the position of the lock
On 11/27/2018 01:57 PM, Javier Gonzalez wrote:
>
>> On 27 Nov 2018, at 02.53, Hua Su <suhua.tanke@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>> Add lock protection for list operations.
>> Signed-off-by: Hua Su <suhua.tanke@...il.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/lightnvm/pblk-core.c | 17 ++++++++++-------
>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/lightnvm/pblk-core.c b/drivers/lightnvm/pblk-core.c
>> index 6944aac43b01..e490df217dac 100644
>> --- a/drivers/lightnvm/pblk-core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/lightnvm/pblk-core.c
>> @@ -1286,24 +1286,27 @@ int pblk_line_recov_alloc(struct pblk *pblk, struct pblk_line *line)
>> list_del(&line->list);
>>
>> ret = pblk_line_prepare(pblk, line);
>> - if (ret) {
>> - list_add(&line->list, &l_mg->free_list);
>> - spin_unlock(&l_mg->free_lock);
>> - return ret;
>> - }
>> - spin_unlock(&l_mg->free_lock);
>> + if (ret)
>> + goto out;
>>
>> ret = pblk_line_alloc_bitmaps(pblk, line);
>> if (ret)
>> - return ret;
>> + goto out;
>>
>> if (!pblk_line_init_bb(pblk, line, 0)) {
>> list_add(&line->list, &l_mg->free_list);
>> + spin_unlock(&l_mg->free_lock);
>> return -EINTR;
>> }
>> + spin_unlock(&l_mg->free_lock);
>>
>> pblk_rl_free_lines_dec(&pblk->rl, line, true);
>> return 0;
>> +
>> +out:
>> + list_add(&line->list, &l_mg->free_list);
>> + spin_unlock(&l_mg->free_lock);
>> + return ret;
>> }
>>
>> void pblk_line_recov_close(struct pblk *pblk, struct pblk_line *line)
>> --
>> 2.19.1
>
> This path is only touched by the recovery path, which is single
> threaded, so there is no race condition as is. Also, if recovery fails,
> pblk will not create the instance at all. This said, it would be
> good to protect the list_add on the pblk_line_init_bb() error path in
> case this code is used for some other purpose in the future.
I like your explanation here. Another option is that we could add a
comment to notify the developer that it safe in this context?
>
> However, the implementation you propose has some issues due to the
> extended critical zone, which covers pblk_line_alloc_bitmaps(). Here,
> allocations are intentionally non-atomic (i.e., GFP_KERNEL).
>
> You can instead do the following:
>
> diff --git i/drivers/lightnvm/pblk-core.c w/drivers/lightnvm/pblk-core.c
> index 615817bf97e3..02c4c1708c45 100644
> --- i/drivers/lightnvm/pblk-core.c
> +++ w/drivers/lightnvm/pblk-core.c
> @@ -1301,15 +1301,22 @@ int pblk_line_recov_alloc(struct pblk *pblk, struct pblk_line *line)
>
> ret = pblk_line_alloc_bitmaps(pblk, line);
> if (ret)
> - return ret;
> + goto fail;
>
> if (!pblk_line_init_bb(pblk, line, 0)) {
> - list_add(&line->list, &l_mg->free_list);
> - return -EINTR;
> + ret = -EINTR;
> + goto fail;
> }
>
> pblk_rl_free_lines_dec(&pblk->rl, line, true);
> return 0;
> +
> +fail:
> + spin_lock(&l_mg->free_lock);
> + list_add(&line->list, &l_mg->free_list);
> + spin_unlock(&l_mg->free_lock);
> +
> + return ret;
> }
>
> void pblk_line_recov_close(struct pblk *pblk, struct pblk_line *line)
>
> Javier
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists