linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 07/13] i2c: acpi: Introduce i2c_acpi_get_i2c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181127142731.GS10650@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 27 Nov 2018 16:27:31 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
        platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/13] i2c: acpi: Introduce
 i2c_acpi_get_i2c_resource() helper

On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 11:07:19AM +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 05:08:52PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > Besides current two users one more is coming. Definitely makes sense to
> > introduce a helper.

> Since this is exported, you may want to add kernel-doc here.

OK.

> > +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
> > @@ -1054,6 +1054,17 @@ static inline int acpi_dev_gpio_irq_get(struct acpi_device *adev, int index)
> >  }
> >  #endif
> >  
> > +#if defined(CONFIG_ACPI) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_I2C)
> > +bool i2c_acpi_get_i2c_resource(struct acpi_resource *ares,
> > +			       struct acpi_resource_i2c_serialbus **i2c);
> > +#else
> > +static inline bool i2c_acpi_get_i2c_resource(struct acpi_resource *ares,
> > +					     struct acpi_resource_i2c_serialbus **i2c)
> > +{
> > +	return false;
> > +}
> 
> I think this belongs to include/linux/i2c.h where we have
> i2c_acpi_find_bus_speed() and friends.

I don't think so. It operates on top of data structures defined solely under
ACPI umbrella. If I move them to i2c.h it would look inconsistent.

Perhaps you would like to have different namespace for it (like acpi_i2c_ ?).

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko