[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wiq9eTzenOPh9srdB=Y8NcP6NJxh7o8Y5SfSjfqZ20-RA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2018 09:08:50 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: rong.a.chen@...el.com
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>, s.priebe@...fihost.ag,
alex.williamson@...hat.com, mgorman@...hsingularity.net,
zi.yan@...rutgers.edu, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
rientjes@...gle.com, kirill@...temov.name,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
lkp@...org
Subject: Re: [LKP] [mm] ac5b2c1891: vm-scalability.throughput -61.3% regression
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 10:24 PM kernel test robot
<rong.a.chen@...el.com> wrote:
>
> FYI, we noticed a -61.3% regression of vm-scalability.throughput due
> to commit ac5b2c18911f ("mm: thp: relax __GFP_THISNODE for
> MADV_HUGEPAGE mappings")
Well, that's certainly noticeable and not good.
Andrea, I suspect it might be causing fights with auto numa migration..
Lots more system time, but also look at this:
> 1122389 ± 9% +17.2% 1315380 ± 4% proc-vmstat.numa_hit
> 214722 ± 5% +21.6% 261076 ± 3% proc-vmstat.numa_huge_pte_updates
> 1108142 ± 9% +17.4% 1300857 ± 4% proc-vmstat.numa_local
> 145368 ± 48% +63.1% 237050 ± 17% proc-vmstat.numa_miss
> 159615 ± 44% +57.6% 251573 ± 16% proc-vmstat.numa_other
> 185.50 ± 81% +8278.6% 15542 ± 40% proc-vmstat.numa_pages_migrated
Should the commit be reverted? Or perhaps at least modified?
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists