[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181128213510.543259e3@kitsune.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 21:35:10 +0100
From: Michal Suchánek <msuchanek@...e.de>
To: Christian Zigotzky <chzigotzky@...osoft.de>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: use generic DMA mapping code in powerpc V4
On Wed, 28 Nov 2018 16:55:30 +0100
Christian Zigotzky <chzigotzky@...osoft.de> wrote:
> On 28 November 2018 at 12:05PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > Nothing specific yet.
> >
> > I'm a bit worried it might break one of the many old obscure platforms
> > we have that aren't well tested.
> >
> Please don't apply the new DMA mapping code if you don't be sure if it
> works on all supported PowerPC machines. Is the new DMA mapping code
> really necessary? It's not really nice, to rewrote code if the old code
> works perfect. We must not forget, that we work for the end users. Does
> the end user have advantages with this new code? Is it faster? The old
> code works without any problems.
There is another service provided to the users as well: new code that is
cleaner and simpler which allows easier bug fixes and new features.
Without being familiar with the DMA mapping code I cannot really say if
that's the case here.
> I am also worried about this code. How
> can I test this new DMA mapping code?
I suppose if your machine works it works for you.
Thanks
Michal
Powered by blists - more mailing lists