[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20181128234325.110011-6-bvanassche@acm.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 15:43:03 -0800
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: mingo@...hat.com
Cc: peterz@...radead.org, tj@...nel.org, johannes.berg@...el.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 05/27] liblockdep: Rename "trywlock" into "trywrlock"
This patch avoids that the following compiler warning is reported while
compiling the lockdep unit tests:
include/liblockdep/rwlock.h: In function 'liblockdep_pthread_rwlock_trywlock':
include/liblockdep/rwlock.h:66:9: warning: implicit declaration of function 'pthread_rwlock_trywlock'; did you mean 'pthread_rwlock_trywrlock'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
return pthread_rwlock_trywlock(&lock->rwlock) == 0 ? 1 : 0;
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
pthread_rwlock_trywrlock
Fixes: 5a52c9b480e0 ("liblockdep: Add public headers for pthread_rwlock_t implementation")
Cc: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
---
tools/lib/lockdep/include/liblockdep/rwlock.h | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/lib/lockdep/include/liblockdep/rwlock.h b/tools/lib/lockdep/include/liblockdep/rwlock.h
index a96c3bf0fef1..365762e3a1ea 100644
--- a/tools/lib/lockdep/include/liblockdep/rwlock.h
+++ b/tools/lib/lockdep/include/liblockdep/rwlock.h
@@ -60,10 +60,10 @@ static inline int liblockdep_pthread_rwlock_tryrdlock(liblockdep_pthread_rwlock_
return pthread_rwlock_tryrdlock(&lock->rwlock) == 0 ? 1 : 0;
}
-static inline int liblockdep_pthread_rwlock_trywlock(liblockdep_pthread_rwlock_t *lock)
+static inline int liblockdep_pthread_rwlock_trywrlock(liblockdep_pthread_rwlock_t *lock)
{
lock_acquire(&lock->dep_map, 0, 1, 0, 1, NULL, (unsigned long)_RET_IP_);
- return pthread_rwlock_trywlock(&lock->rwlock) == 0 ? 1 : 0;
+ return pthread_rwlock_trywrlock(&lock->rwlock) == 0 ? 1 : 0;
}
static inline int liblockdep_rwlock_destroy(liblockdep_pthread_rwlock_t *lock)
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ static inline int liblockdep_rwlock_destroy(liblockdep_pthread_rwlock_t *lock)
#define pthread_rwlock_unlock liblockdep_pthread_rwlock_unlock
#define pthread_rwlock_wrlock liblockdep_pthread_rwlock_wrlock
#define pthread_rwlock_tryrdlock liblockdep_pthread_rwlock_tryrdlock
-#define pthread_rwlock_trywlock liblockdep_pthread_rwlock_trywlock
+#define pthread_rwlock_trywrlock liblockdep_pthread_rwlock_trywrlock
#define pthread_rwlock_destroy liblockdep_rwlock_destroy
#endif
--
2.20.0.rc0.387.gc7a69e6b6c-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists