[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <00c2a9d45e39fb294f4995b07a9b7547206c3085.1543374820.git.gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2018 22:34:35 -0600
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org
Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
Subject: [PATCH 41/41] scsi: xen-scsifront: mark expected switch fall-through
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Notice that, in this particular case, I replaced
"Missed the backend's Closing state -- fallthrough" with
"fall through - Missed the backend's Closing state", which
contains the "fall through" annotation at the beginnig of
the code comment, which is what GCC is expecting to find.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
---
drivers/scsi/xen-scsifront.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/xen-scsifront.c b/drivers/scsi/xen-scsifront.c
index 61389bdc7926..bb76d0d2022b 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/xen-scsifront.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/xen-scsifront.c
@@ -1112,7 +1112,7 @@ static void scsifront_backend_changed(struct xenbus_device *dev,
case XenbusStateClosed:
if (dev->state == XenbusStateClosed)
break;
- /* Missed the backend's Closing state -- fallthrough */
+ /* fall through - Missed the backend's Closing state */
case XenbusStateClosing:
scsifront_disconnect(info);
break;
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists