[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <544d1da2adb45f369f002638760d1c933b482cb0.1543374820.git.gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2018 22:30:27 -0600
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To: Intel SCU Linux support <intel-linux-scu@...el.com>,
Artur Paszkiewicz <artur.paszkiewicz@...el.com>
Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
Subject: [PATCH 20/41] scsi: isci: request: mark expected switch fall-through
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Notice that, in this particular case, a dash is added as a token in
order to separate the "Fall through" annotation from the rest of the
comment on the same line, which is what GCC is expecting to find.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
---
drivers/scsi/isci/request.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/isci/request.c b/drivers/scsi/isci/request.c
index 2f151708b59a..1b18cf55167e 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/isci/request.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/isci/request.c
@@ -894,7 +894,7 @@ sci_io_request_terminate(struct isci_request *ireq)
* and don't wait for the task response.
*/
sci_change_state(&ireq->sm, SCI_REQ_ABORTING);
- /* Fall through and handle like ABORTING... */
+ /* Fall through - and handle like ABORTING... */
case SCI_REQ_ABORTING:
if (!isci_remote_device_is_safe_to_abort(ireq->target_device))
set_bit(IREQ_PENDING_ABORT, &ireq->flags);
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists