[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5fceeac101cc3dfe4a129764a139c1b616cba292.1543374820.git.gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2018 22:32:34 -0600
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To: Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@...adcom.com>,
Sumit Saxena <sumit.saxena@...adcom.com>,
Shivasharan S <shivasharan.srikanteshwara@...adcom.com>,
megaraidlinux.pdl@...adcom.com
Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
Subject: [PATCH 30/41] scsi: megaraid_sas_fusion: Mark expected switch
fall-through
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Notice that, in this particular case, I replaced "Fall thru" with a
"Fall through" annotation and added a dash as a token in order to
separate the "Fall through" annotation from the rest of the comment
on the same line, which is what GCC is expecting to find.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
---
drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fusion.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fusion.c b/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fusion.c
index c5e6bccb0895..8f37ad83be9a 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fusion.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fusion.c
@@ -3453,7 +3453,7 @@ complete_cmd_fusion(struct megasas_instance *instance, u32 MSIxIndex)
atomic_dec(&lbinfo->scsi_pending_cmds[cmd_fusion->pd_r1_lb]);
cmd_fusion->scmd->SCp.Status &= ~MEGASAS_LOAD_BALANCE_FLAG;
}
- //Fall thru and complete IO
+ /* Fall through - and complete IO */
case MEGASAS_MPI2_FUNCTION_LD_IO_REQUEST: /* LD-IO Path */
atomic_dec(&instance->fw_outstanding);
if (cmd_fusion->r1_alt_dev_handle == MR_DEVHANDLE_INVALID) {
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists