lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DB3PR0402MB3916A593FAD5254AB0E3CC54F5D10@DB3PR0402MB3916.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Wed, 28 Nov 2018 09:03:59 +0000
From:   Anson Huang <anson.huang@....com>
To:     Lothar Waßmann <LW@...O-electronics.de>
CC:     "a.zummo@...ertech.it" <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
        "alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com" <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        "robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
        "catalin.marinas@....com" <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        "will.deacon@....com" <will.deacon@....com>,
        Aisheng DONG <aisheng.dong@....com>,
        Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>,
        "arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
        "horms+renesas@...ge.net.au" <horms+renesas@...ge.net.au>,
        "heiko@...ech.de" <heiko@...ech.de>,
        "bjorn.andersson@...aro.org" <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        "enric.balletbo@...labora.com" <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>,
        "amit.kucheria@...aro.org" <amit.kucheria@...aro.org>,
        "ezequiel@...labora.com" <ezequiel@...labora.com>,
        "olof@...om.net" <olof@...om.net>,
        "shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        "linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V2 2/4] rtc: add i.MX system controller RTC support

Hi, Lothar

Best Regards!
Anson Huang

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lothar Waßmann [mailto:LW@...O-electronics.de]
> Sent: 2018年11月28日 17:01
> To: Anson Huang <anson.huang@....com>
> Cc: a.zummo@...ertech.it; alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com;
> robh+dt@...nel.org; mark.rutland@....com; catalin.marinas@....com;
> will.deacon@....com; Aisheng DONG <aisheng.dong@....com>; Andy Gross
> <andy.gross@...aro.org>; arnd@...db.de; horms+renesas@...ge.net.au;
> heiko@...ech.de; bjorn.andersson@...aro.org; enric.balletbo@...labora.com;
> amit.kucheria@...aro.org; ezequiel@...labora.com; olof@...om.net;
> shawnguo@...nel.org; linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org; devicetree@...r.kernel.org;
> linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org;
> dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/4] rtc: add i.MX system controller RTC support
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On Wed, 28 Nov 2018 05:21:11 +0000 Anson Huang wrote:
> > i.MX8QXP is an ARMv8 SoC which has a Cortex-M4 system controller
> > inside, the system controller is in charge of controlling power, clock
> > and secure rtc etc..
> >
> > This patch adds i.MX system controller RTC driver support, Linux
> > kernel has to communicate with system controller via MU (message unit)
> > IPC to set/get RTC time and other alarm functions, since the RTC set
> > time needs to be done in secure EL3 mode (required by system
> > controller firmware) and alarm functions needs to be done with general
> > MU IRQ handle, these depend on other components which are NOT ready,
> > so this patch ONLY enables the RTC time read.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@....com>
> > ---
> > changes since V1:
> > 	- sort module in Makefile alphabetically;
> > 	- remove boiler plate license text;
> > 	- use devm_rtc_allocate_device and rtc_register_device to register the
> RTC.
> >  drivers/rtc/Kconfig      |   6 +++
> >  drivers/rtc/Makefile     |   1 +
> >  drivers/rtc/rtc-imx-sc.c | 107
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  3 files changed, 114 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 drivers/rtc/rtc-imx-sc.c
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/rtc/Kconfig b/drivers/rtc/Kconfig index
> > a819ef0..3b9642e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/rtc/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/rtc/Kconfig
> > @@ -1677,6 +1677,12 @@ config RTC_DRV_SNVS
> >  	   This driver can also be built as a module, if so, the module
> >  	   will be called "rtc-snvs".
> >
> > +config RTC_DRV_IMX_SC
> > +	tristate "NXP i.MX System Controller RTC support"
> > +	help
> > +	   If you say yes here you get support for the NXP i.MX System
> > +	   Controller RTC module.
> > +
> >  config RTC_DRV_SIRFSOC
> >  	tristate "SiRFSOC RTC"
> >  	depends on ARCH_SIRF
> > diff --git a/drivers/rtc/Makefile b/drivers/rtc/Makefile index
> > 290c173..f97c05e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/rtc/Makefile
> > +++ b/drivers/rtc/Makefile
> > @@ -75,6 +75,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_GOLDFISH)	+=
> rtc-goldfish.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_HID_SENSOR_TIME) += rtc-hid-sensor-time.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_HYM8563)	+= rtc-hym8563.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_IMXDI)	+= rtc-imxdi.o
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_IMX_SC)	+= rtc-imx-sc.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_ISL12022)	+= rtc-isl12022.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_ISL12026)	+= rtc-isl12026.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_ISL1208)	+= rtc-isl1208.o
> > diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-imx-sc.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-imx-sc.c new
> > file mode 100644 index 0000000..7212e38
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-imx-sc.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,107 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
> > +/*
> > + * Copyright 2018 NXP.
> > + */
> > +
> > +#include <linux/init.h>
> > +#include <linux/io.h>
> > +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> > +#include <linux/firmware/imx/sci.h>
> > +#include <linux/module.h>
> > +#include <linux/of.h>
> > +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > +#include <linux/rtc.h>
> > +
> > +#define IMX_SC_TIMER_FUNC_GET_RTC_SEC1970	9
> > +#define IMX_SC_TIMER_FUNC_SET_RTC_TIME		6
> > +
> > +struct imx_sc_ipc *rtc_ipc_handle;
> > +struct rtc_device *rtc;
> > +
> Shouldn't these be static?
> A generic name like 'rtc' as a global variable name is definitely a very bad idea.

Agreed, will improve them in V3 patch set.

> 
> > +struct imx_sc_msg_req_timer_get_rtc_time {
> > +	struct imx_sc_rpc_msg hdr;
> > +} __packed;
> > +
> > +struct imx_sc_msg_resp_timer_get_rtc_time {
> > +	struct imx_sc_rpc_msg hdr;
> > +	u32 time;
> > +} __packed;
> > +
> > +static int imx_sc_rtc_read_time(struct device *dev, struct rtc_time
> > +*tm) {
> > +	struct imx_sc_msg_resp_timer_get_rtc_time *resp;
> > +	struct imx_sc_msg_req_timer_get_rtc_time msg;
> > +	struct imx_sc_rpc_msg *hdr = &msg.hdr;
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	hdr->ver = IMX_SC_RPC_VERSION;
> > +	hdr->svc = IMX_SC_RPC_SVC_TIMER;
> > +	hdr->func = IMX_SC_TIMER_FUNC_GET_RTC_SEC1970;
> > +	hdr->size = 1;
> > +
> > +	ret = imx_scu_call_rpc(rtc_ipc_handle, &msg, true);
> > +	if (ret) {
> > +		pr_err("read rtc time failed, ret %d\n", ret);
> > +		return ret;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	resp = (struct imx_sc_msg_resp_timer_get_rtc_time *)&msg;
> > +	rtc_time_to_tm(resp->time, tm);
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const struct rtc_class_ops imx_sc_rtc_ops = {
> > +	.read_time = imx_sc_rtc_read_time,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static int imx_sc_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) {
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	ret = imx_scu_get_handle(&rtc_ipc_handle);
> > +	if (ret) {
> > +		if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> > +			return ret;
> > +
> > +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get ipc handle: %d!\n", ret);
> > +		return ret;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	rtc = devm_rtc_allocate_device(&pdev->dev);
> > +	if (IS_ERR(rtc)) {
> > +		ret = PTR_ERR(rtc);
> > +		return ret;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	rtc->ops = &imx_sc_rtc_ops;
> > +	rtc->range_min = 0;
> > +	rtc->range_max = U32_MAX;
> > +
> > +	ret = rtc_register_device(rtc);
> > +	if (ret) {
> > +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to register rtc: %d\n", ret);
> > +		return ret;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const struct of_device_id imx_sc_dt_ids[] = {
> > +	{ .compatible = "nxp,imx8qxp-sc-rtc", },
> > +	{},
> s/{},/{}/
> The trailing comma is usually added to make patches that add more entries to
> the array simpler and help avoid patch conflicts.
> Since the empty entry MUST be the LAST entry in this array the comma should
> NOT be added here. Without the comma, adding new entries after the EOL
> marker will generate a compile error.

Thanks for review, will improve it in V3 patch set.

Anson.

> 
> 
> Lothar Waßmann

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ