[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87a7ltjxnz.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 11:37:04 +0100
From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
To: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>
Cc: "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
"Michael Kelley \(EOSG\)" <Michael.H.Kelley@...rosoft.com>,
"kvm\@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"x86\@kernel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
Roman Kagan <rkagan@...tuozzo.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] x86/hyper-v: move synic/stimer control structures definitions to hyperv-tlfs.h
Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com> writes:
>
> On a different note: how come all of the hyper-v structs are not marked
> with the “packed" attribute?
"packed" should not be needed with proper padding; I vaguely remember
someone (from x86@?) arguing _against_ "packed".
--
Vitaly
Powered by blists - more mailing lists