linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] mfd: ti_am335x_tscadc: Provide unique name for child mfd cells

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 28 Nov 2018 17:13:42 +0530
From:   Vignesh R <vigneshr@...com>
To:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
CC:     Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
        Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
        <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mfd: ti_am335x_tscadc: Provide unique name for child
 mfd cells



On 28/11/18 4:33 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Nov 2018, Vignesh R wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 28/11/18 2:37 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
>>> On Mon, 19 Nov 2018, Vignesh R wrote:
>>>
>>>> Provide unique names for child mfd cells, this is required in order to
>>>> support registering of multiple instances of same ti_am335x_tscadc IP.
>>>
>>> I don't think it is.  What is the error you are receiving?
>>
>> W/o this patch I get:
>>
>> [    2.296839] sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/bus/platform/devices/TI-am335x-adc'
>> [    2.305085] CPU: 0 PID: 31 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 4.20.0-rc3-next-20181123-00018-g
>> 7791ce8f123f-dirty #182
>> [    2.315254] Hardware name: Texas Instruments AM654 Base Board (DT)
>> [    2.321447] Workqueue: events deferred_probe_work_func
>> [    2.326585] Call trace:
>> [    2.329036]  dump_backtrace+0x0/0x1c0
>> [    2.332699]  show_stack+0x14/0x20
>> [    2.336017]  dump_stack+0x9c/0xbc
>> [    2.339333]  sysfs_warn_dup+0x60/0x78
>> [    2.342995]  sysfs_do_create_link_sd.isra.0+0xdc/0xe8
>> [    2.348042]  sysfs_create_link+0x20/0x40
>> [    2.351963]  bus_add_device+0x68/0x130
>> [    2.355711]  device_add+0x398/0x618
>> [    2.359199]  platform_device_add+0x120/0x290
>> [    2.363469]  mfd_add_device+0x23c/0x2e8
>> [    2.367302]  mfd_add_devices+0xb4/0x158
>> [    2.371136]  ti_tscadc_probe+0x35c/0x4c8
>> [    2.375056]  platform_drv_probe+0x50/0xa0
>> [    2.379062]  really_probe+0x204/0x2a8
>> [    2.382722]  driver_probe_device+0x58/0x100
>> [    2.386903]  __device_attach_driver+0x98/0xf0
>> [    2.391258]  bus_for_each_drv+0x64/0xc8
>> [    2.395091]  __device_attach+0xd8/0x138
>> [    2.398923]  device_initial_probe+0x10/0x18
>> [    2.403103]  bus_probe_device+0x90/0x98
>> [    2.406938]  deferred_probe_work_func+0x74/0xb0
>> [    2.411470]  process_one_work+0x1e0/0x330
>> [    2.415478]  worker_thread+0x238/0x460
>> [    2.419225]  kthread+0x128/0x130
>> [    2.422452]  ret_from_fork+0x10/0x1c
>> [    2.426195] ti_am3359-tscadc: probe of 40210000.tscadc failed with error -1
> 
> That's because of the way the cells are being registered:
> 
>         err = mfd_add_devices(&pdev->dev, pdev->id, tscadc->cells,
>                 tscadc->used_cells, NULL, 0, NULL);
> 
> The cells are not numbered (tscadc->cells->id is always 0) and you are
> forcing the use of the platform ID from the parent platform device
> (with pdev->id here).  Instead you should s/pdev->id/PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO/
> or number the cells manually. I suggest the former.
> 

Using PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO works fine. I will post v2 with this change.
Thanks for the suggestion!

Regards
Vignesh

>>>> Signed-off-by: Vignesh R <vigneshr@...com>
>>>> ---
>>>>  drivers/mfd/ti_am335x_tscadc.c | 6 ++++--
>>>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/ti_am335x_tscadc.c b/drivers/mfd/ti_am335x_tscadc.c
>>>> index c2d47d78705b..ee08af34f81d 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/mfd/ti_am335x_tscadc.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/mfd/ti_am335x_tscadc.c
>>>> @@ -248,7 +248,8 @@ static	int ti_tscadc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>>  	if (tsc_wires > 0) {
>>>>  		tscadc->tsc_cell = tscadc->used_cells;
>>>>  		cell = &tscadc->cells[tscadc->used_cells++];
>>>> -		cell->name = "TI-am335x-tsc";
>>>> +		cell->name = devm_kasprintf(&pdev->dev, GFP_KERNEL, "%s:%s",
>>>> +					    dev_name(&pdev->dev), "tsc");
>>>>  		cell->of_compatible = "ti,am3359-tsc";
>>>>  		cell->platform_data = &tscadc;
>>>>  		cell->pdata_size = sizeof(tscadc);
>>>> @@ -258,7 +259,8 @@ static	int ti_tscadc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>>  	if (adc_channels > 0) {
>>>>  		tscadc->adc_cell = tscadc->used_cells;
>>>>  		cell = &tscadc->cells[tscadc->used_cells++];
>>>> -		cell->name = "TI-am335x-adc";
>>>> +		cell->name = devm_kasprintf(&pdev->dev, GFP_KERNEL, "%s:%s",
>>>> +					    dev_name(&pdev->dev), "adc");
>>>>  		cell->of_compatible = "ti,am3359-adc";
>>>>  		cell->platform_data = &tscadc;
>>>>  		cell->pdata_size = sizeof(tscadc);
>>>
>>
> 

-- 
Regards
Vignesh