[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181128141049.GD30395@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 15:10:50 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@...linux.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Elvira Khabirova <lineprinter@...linux.org>,
Eugene Syromyatnikov <esyr@...hat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
strace-devel@...ts.strace.io
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] ptrace: add PTRACE_GET_SYSCALL_INFO request
On 11/28, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
>
> +static unsigned long
> +ptrace_get_syscall_info_entry(struct task_struct *child,
> + struct ptrace_syscall_info *info)
> +{
> + struct pt_regs *regs = task_pt_regs(child);
> + unsigned long args[ARRAY_SIZE(info->entry.args)];
> + int i;
> +
> + info->op = PTRACE_SYSCALL_INFO_ENTRY;
> + info->arch = syscall_get_arch(child);
> + info->entry.nr = syscall_get_nr(child, regs);
> + info->entry.instruction_pointer = instruction_pointer(regs);
> + info->entry.stack_pointer = user_stack_pointer(regs);
> + info->entry.frame_pointer = frame_pointer(regs);
> + syscall_get_arguments(child, regs, 0, ARRAY_SIZE(args), args);
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(args); i++)
> + info->entry.args[i] = args[i];
I must have missed something, but why do we need the temporary args[],
syscall_get_arguments(..., info->entry.args) should equally work?
Oleg.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists