lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <10285.1543417950@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date:   Wed, 28 Nov 2018 15:12:30 +0000
From:   David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:     NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com>
Cc:     dhowells@...hat.com, linux-cachefs@...hat.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fscache: fix race between enablement and dropping of object

NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com> wrote:

> It was observed that a process blocked indefintely in
> __fscache_read_or_alloc_page(), waiting for FSCACHE_COOKIE_LOOKING_UP
> to be cleared via fscache_wait_for_deferred_lookup().

Was there a backtrace for that?

> This leaves a window where something else can set FSCACHE_COOKIE_LOOKING_UP

Attempting to enable the cookie again would have that effect.

> There is some uncertainty in this analysis, but it seems to be fit the
> observations.  Adding the wake in this patch will be handled correctly
> by __fscache_read_or_alloc_page(), as it checks if ->backing_objects
> is empty again, after waiting.

That should work.  The read op should just then fail with -ENOBUFS, causing
the netfs to issue the read over the network instead.

I think there's a more elegant solution to be had, but it'll take some thought
as to how to achieve it.

David

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ