lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5a45f520-03b0-3679-2175-a19681062bf6@ti.com>
Date:   Wed, 28 Nov 2018 22:28:52 +0530
From:   "Rizvi, Mohammad Faiz Abbas" <faiz_abbas@...com>
To:     Chunyan Zhang <zhang.chunyan@...aro.org>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
CC:     <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
        Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>,
        Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@...il.com>, <broonie@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Add support for using external dma in SDHCI

+ Mark Brown

Chunyan,

On 11/21/2018 5:17 PM, Faiz Abbas wrote:
> Hi Chunyan,
> 
> On 12/11/18 12:56 PM, Chunyan Zhang wrote:
>> Currently the generic SDHCI code in the Linux kernel supports the SD
>> standard DMA integrated into the host controller but does not have any
>> support for external DMA controllers implemented using dmaengine meaning
>> that custom code is needed for any systems that use a generic DMA
>> controller with SDHCI which in practice means any SDHCI controller that
>> doesn't have an integrated DMA controller so we should have this as a
>> generic feature.
>>
>> There are already a number of controller specific drivers that have dmaengine
>> code, and some could use sdhci.c actually, but needed to implement mmc_ops->request()
>> in their specific driver for sending command with external dma using dmaengine
>> framework, with this patchset, them will take advantage of the generic support.
>> TI's omap controller is the case as an example.
>>
>> Any comments are very appreciated.
>>
> 
> This is great. It helps us move am335x and am43xx platforms to
> sdhci-omap. What platforms have you tested this on?
> 

Gentle ping on this. I tried testing these with an am335x-evm board. In 
their current condition, the card fails to enumerate altogether. The 
changes suggested by Adrian should fix this. Let me know when you post a v3.

Thanks,
Faiz

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ