linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.19 057/110] can: raw: check for CAN FD capable netdev in raw

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20181129135923.570105843@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Thu, 29 Nov 2018 15:12:28 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>,
        Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH 4.19 057/110] can: raw: check for CAN FD capable netdev in raw_sendmsg()

4.19-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>

commit a43608fa77213ad5ac5f75994254b9f65d57cfa0 upstream.

When the socket is CAN FD enabled it can handle CAN FD frame
transmissions.  Add an additional check in raw_sendmsg() as a CAN2.0 CAN
driver (non CAN FD) should never see a CAN FD frame. Due to the commonly
used can_dropped_invalid_skb() function the CAN 2.0 driver would drop
that CAN FD frame anyway - but with this patch the user gets a proper
-EINVAL return code.

Signed-off-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>
Cc: linux-stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 net/can/raw.c |   15 ++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

--- a/net/can/raw.c
+++ b/net/can/raw.c
@@ -745,18 +745,19 @@ static int raw_sendmsg(struct socket *so
 	} else
 		ifindex = ro->ifindex;
 
-	if (ro->fd_frames) {
+	dev = dev_get_by_index(sock_net(sk), ifindex);
+	if (!dev)
+		return -ENXIO;
+
+	err = -EINVAL;
+	if (ro->fd_frames && dev->mtu == CANFD_MTU) {
 		if (unlikely(size != CANFD_MTU && size != CAN_MTU))
-			return -EINVAL;
+			goto put_dev;
 	} else {
 		if (unlikely(size != CAN_MTU))
-			return -EINVAL;
+			goto put_dev;
 	}
 
-	dev = dev_get_by_index(sock_net(sk), ifindex);
-	if (!dev)
-		return -ENXIO;
-
 	skb = sock_alloc_send_skb(sk, size + sizeof(struct can_skb_priv),
 				  msg->msg_flags & MSG_DONTWAIT, &err);
 	if (!skb)