[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181129031129.GG6379@jagdpanzerIV>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 12:11:29 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
To: Dave Rodgman <dave.rodgman@....com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
nd <nd@....com>,
"herbert@...dor.apana.org.au" <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Matt Sealey <Matt.Sealey@....com>,
"nitingupta910@...il.com" <nitingupta910@...il.com>,
"rpurdie@...nedhand.com" <rpurdie@...nedhand.com>,
"markus@...rhumer.com" <markus@...rhumer.com>,
"minchan@...nel.org" <minchan@...nel.org>,
"sonnyrao@...gle.com" <sonnyrao@...gle.com>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] lib/lzo: implement run-length encoding
On (11/29/18 12:08), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (11/27/18 16:19), Dave Rodgman wrote:
> >
> > This modifies the bitstream in a way which is backwards compatible
> > (i.e., we can decompress old bitstreams, but old versions of lzo
> > cannot decompress new bitstreams).
> >
>
> Hmmm... Whoa. Help me understand this:
>
> So a btrfs filesystem, compressed with the new lzo, say I run 4.21,
> won't be readable at all once I reboot under 4.19?
>
> What about compressed net traffic between servers running different
> kernel version (one with new lzo, the other one with old lzo)?
> XFRM can be compressed with lzo, can't it?
Ah, false alarm. Sorry for the noise!
You create a new lzo version in the next patch.
-ss
Powered by blists - more mailing lists