[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b98fdad2b1fab93132e8535e5589eacfcf02a00c.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 09:08:05 -0600
From: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...ux.intel.com>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] tracing: Unifying dynamic event interface
Hi Masami,
On Thu, 2018-11-29 at 14:20 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On Wed, 28 Nov 2018 17:42:22 -0600
> Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Masami,
> >
> > On Wed, 2018-11-28 at 16:31 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> > > Ping?
> > >
> > > Hi Tom,
> > >
> > > This series, especially [09/12] tracing: Remove unneeded
> > > synth_event_mutex
> > > will effect your current working series. Please tell me your
> > > opinion.
> > >
> >
> > Sorry for the delay in reviewing this - I completely forgot about
> > it in
> > my inbox.
> >
> > It's all very nice, and the mutex updates along with the dyn_event
> > management make that part of the code much cleaner, thanks!
> >
> > In any case, you can have my
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...ux.intel.com>
> > Tested-by: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...ux.intel.com>
>
> Thank you!
> And as I pointed, synth_event_mutex is removed by this series, it may
> affect your hist trigger series too.
>
Yes, thanks for pointing that out - I'll rebase mine on top of this.
Tom
Powered by blists - more mailing lists