[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181129111708.766f35d6@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 11:17:08 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [for-next][PATCH 00/18] function_graph: Add separate depth
counter to prevent trace corruption
On Thu, 29 Nov 2018 10:08:55 -0500
Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...hat.com> wrote:
> With the "take 2" patch, I only see smp_irq_work_interrupt() graph when
> the graph_function is in progress.. for example:
In other words it works :-)
Can I get a Tested-by from you?
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists