linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/10] Regulator ena

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181129162933.GG10570@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Thu, 29 Nov 2018 16:29:33 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:     Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] Regulator ena_gpiod fixups

On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 04:52:04PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:

> Essentially the semantic is that the  [devm_]regulator_register()
> call will immediately take ownership of the descriptor
> and place it in the regulator core.

I think that's going to be the easiest thing to work with, it's more
pain in the regulator core but simpler for all the users which is
probably a good balance.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)