[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181129171038.GA4651@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 18:10:38 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Tigran Aivazian <aivazian.tigran@...il.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
syzbot <syzbot+71c6b5d68e91149fc8a4@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, willy@...radead.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 033/110] bfs: add sanity check at bfs_fill_super()
On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 04:55:20PM +0000, Tigran Aivazian wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Nov 2018 at 16:07, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 03:23:00PM +0000, Tigran Aivazian wrote:
> > > Yes, of course I object to it.
> > I can not apply a patch to the stable trees that are not in Linus's tree
> > first. So there's nothing I can do here with this.
>
> Ok, we can wait until my patch propagates into Linus' tree, but I
> would have thought it would be a waste of your time to apply a patch
> which is waiting to be inevitably superseded by a different one.
Your patch has to apply on top of the existing one, so there's not an
issue here.
And might as well fix it now, as I can never count on a "future" patch
getting merged.
> I can
> see there are 238 PRs at Linus' tree on github and I am very glad that
> I looked into one of them --- it contained a long comment explaining
> that I should NOT do what I was just about to do, i.e. make a PR
> against Linus' tree! :)
We do not do kernel development on github :)
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists