linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] drm: msm: Replace dma_map_sg with dma_sync

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181129173301.rye77slpy27regi5@DESKTOP-E1NTVVP.localdomain>
Date:   Thu, 29 Nov 2018 17:33:03 +0000
From:   Brian Starkey <Brian.Starkey@....com>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
CC:     "Clark, Rob" <robdclark@...il.com>, Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...omium.org>,
        Sean Paul <seanpaul@...omium.org>,
        "vivek.gautam@...eaurora.org" <vivek.gautam@...eaurora.org>,
        freedreno <freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Robin Murphy <Robin.Murphy@....com>, nd <nd@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] drm: msm: Replace dma_map_sg with dma_sync_sg*

Hi Christoph,

On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 05:57:15PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> 
> As for the buffer sharing: at least for the DMA API side I want to
> move the current buffer sharing users away from dma_alloc_coherent
> (and coherent dma_alloc_attrs users) and the remapping done in there
> required for non-coherent architectures.  Instead I'd like to allocate
> plain old pages, and then just dma map them for each device separately,
> with DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC passed for all but the first user to map
> or last user to unmap.  On the iommu side it could probably work
> similar.
> 
> I have done some preliminary work on this, and want to get it into this
> merge window, but there is a few other bits I need to sort out first.
> 

This sounds very useful for ion, to avoid CPU cache maintenance as
long as the buffer stays in device-land.

One question though: How would you determine "the last user to unmap"
to know when to do the final "make visible to CPU" step?

Thanks,
-Brian