[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <666E3CE2-CD96-4271-8F9C-614F96D24F26@amacapital.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 09:41:33 -0800
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, julia@...com, jeyu@...nel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] x86/static_call: Add inline static call implementation for x86-64
> On Nov 29, 2018, at 9:21 AM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 29 Nov 2018 12:20:00 -0500
> Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
>
>
>> r8 = return address
>> r9 = function to call
>>
>
> Bad example, r8 and r9 are args, but r10 and r11 are available.
>
> -- Steve
>
>> push r8
>> jmp *r9
>>
>> Then have the regs->ip point to that trampoline.
Cute. That’ll need ORC annotations and some kind of retpoline to replace the indirect jump, though.
>>
>> -- Steve
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists