[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <154353264837.32133.3701953928194212665.stgit@noble>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 10:04:08 +1100
From: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
Martin Wilck <mwilck@...e.de>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Frank Filz <ffilzlnx@...dspring.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 04/12] gfs2: properly initial file_lock used for unlock.
Rather than assuming all-zeros is sufficient, use the available API to
initialize the file_lock structure use for unlock. VFS-level changes
will soon make it important that the list_heads in file_lock are
always properly initialized.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com>
Reviewed-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@...hat.com>
---
fs/gfs2/file.c | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/gfs2/file.c b/fs/gfs2/file.c
index 45a17b770d97..a2dea5bc0427 100644
--- a/fs/gfs2/file.c
+++ b/fs/gfs2/file.c
@@ -1199,13 +1199,13 @@ static int do_flock(struct file *file, int cmd, struct file_lock *fl)
mutex_lock(&fp->f_fl_mutex);
if (gfs2_holder_initialized(fl_gh)) {
+ struct file_lock request;
if (fl_gh->gh_state == state)
goto out;
- locks_lock_file_wait(file,
- &(struct file_lock) {
- .fl_type = F_UNLCK,
- .fl_flags = FL_FLOCK
- });
+ locks_init_lock(&request);
+ request.fl_type = F_UNLCK;
+ request.fl_flags = FL_FLOCK;
+ locks_lock_file_wait(file, &request);
gfs2_glock_dq(fl_gh);
gfs2_holder_reinit(state, flags, fl_gh);
} else {
Powered by blists - more mailing lists