linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 13/17] clk: sunxi-ng: add support for suniv F1C100s SoC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <154353465409.88331.8677593357765162802@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date:   Thu, 29 Nov 2018 15:37:34 -0800
From:   Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To:     Mesih Kilinc <mesihkilinc@...il.com>
Cc:     devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com,
        Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
        Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@...c.io>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Julian Calaby <julian.calaby@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 13/17] clk: sunxi-ng: add support for suniv F1C100s SoC

Quoting Mesih Kilinc (2018-11-28 22:39:52)
> On 18/11/28 04:47, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Quoting Mesih Kilinc (2018-11-28 14:33:23)
> > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu-suniv-f1c100s.c b/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu-suniv-f1c100s.c
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 0000000..d4bc1b8
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu-suniv-f1c100s.c
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,541 @@
> > > +/*
> > > + * Copyright (c) 2016 Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@...c.io>
> > > + *
> > > + * SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > 
> > Please fix this location.
> 
> I am very sorry, I should have been more carefull. Should I resend whole
> patchset or just resending this patch is enough? 
> 

Just this one? Who do you intend to pick up these patches?