linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: allow to configure min tx packet size

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 28 Nov 2018 17:22:12 -0800 (PST)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     andrew@...n.ch
Cc:     grygorii.strashko@...com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, nsekhar@...com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: allow to configure min tx
 packet size

From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 01:28:35 +0100

> On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 04:43:40PM -0600, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>> Hi Andrew,
>> 
>> On 11/28/18 4:02 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> >> This is dynamic configuration related to ALE VLAN entries and
>> >> I do not see the way to support its auto-detection with current driver,
>> >> unfortunately.
>> > 
>> > I think you can subscribe to switchdev events which will tell you.
>> 
>> Thanks a lot for your review and comments.
>> 
>> Unfortunately, we still do not have switchdev in place, but i need to resolve
>> existing issue somehow. This patch is small, local to CPSW fix which can be
>> backported to stable. So, if possible, and no strong objection, could we proceed with it?
> 
> Hi Grygorii
> 
> David is the person who generally says no to kernel module
> parameters. You should ask him.

No module options.

You'll be stuck with it forever.

Sorry.