linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] Makefile: Fix distcc compilation with x86 macros

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 29 Nov 2018 01:31:27 +0000
From:   Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>
To:     Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>
CC:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
        Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
        Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Makefile: Fix distcc compilation with x86 macros

> On Nov 28, 2018, at 4:49 PM, Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On 2018-11-28 5:38 p.m., Nadav Amit wrote:
>> So what’s your take? Would you think this patch is still needed? Should it
>> only be enabled automatically for distcc and not for distcc-pump?
> 
> Not sure. The patch will probably slow things down a lot (seeing
> assembly is always done locally and there are twice as many compile
> steps) and will create some confusion once it's possible to disable it
> for the new versions. Maybe hold off and see if anyone else complains?
> 
> I don't really know how you'd detect whether pump is in use or not and
> I'm uncertain as to whether any of the auto detection can actually be
> made to be reliable.

A silly `$(CC) —version | grep pump ` test.

Anyhow, it is up to Masahiro.