[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1CAF7187-4732-4BC9-8F7F-93EB16ED14E9@vmware.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 01:31:27 +0000
From: Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>
To: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Makefile: Fix distcc compilation with x86 macros
> On Nov 28, 2018, at 4:49 PM, Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2018-11-28 5:38 p.m., Nadav Amit wrote:
>> So what’s your take? Would you think this patch is still needed? Should it
>> only be enabled automatically for distcc and not for distcc-pump?
>
> Not sure. The patch will probably slow things down a lot (seeing
> assembly is always done locally and there are twice as many compile
> steps) and will create some confusion once it's possible to disable it
> for the new versions. Maybe hold off and see if anyone else complains?
>
> I don't really know how you'd detect whether pump is in use or not and
> I'm uncertain as to whether any of the auto detection can actually be
> made to be reliable.
A silly `$(CC) —version | grep pump ` test.
Anyhow, it is up to Masahiro.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists