linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] vfio: ap: AP Queue Interrupt Control VFIO ioctl calls

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 29 Nov 2018 13:44:51 +0100
From:   Pierre Morel <pmorel@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>
Cc:     borntraeger@...ibm.com, alex.williamson@...hat.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, frankja@...ux.ibm.com, akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com,
        pasic@...ux.ibm.com, david@...hat.com, schwidefsky@...ibm.com,
        heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, freude@...ux.ibm.com, mimu@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] vfio: ap: AP Queue Interrupt Control VFIO ioctl
 calls

On 29/11/2018 12:37, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Nov 2018 18:11:15 +0100
> Pierre Morel <pmorel@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
>> This is the implementation of the VFIO ioctl calls to handle
>> the AQIC interception and use GISA to handle interrupts.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@...ux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c | 110 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>   1 file changed, 109 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
>> index 272ef42..f6e942f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
>> +++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
>> @@ -895,12 +895,121 @@ static int vfio_ap_mdev_get_device_info(unsigned long arg)
>>   	return copy_to_user((void __user *)arg, &info, minsz);
>>   }
>>   
>> +static unsigned long vfio_ap_get_nib(struct kvm *kvm, struct vfio_ap_aqic *parm)
>> +{
>> +	struct s390_io_adapter *adapter;
>> +	struct s390_map_info *map;
>> +	unsigned long nib;
>> +	int found = 0;
>> +
>> +	/* find the adapter */
>> +	if (parm->adapter_id > MAX_S390_IO_ADAPTERS)
>> +		return 0;
>> +
>> +	adapter = kvm->arch.adapters[parm->adapter_id];
>> +	if (!adapter)
>> +		return 0;
>> +
>> +	down_write(&adapter->maps_lock);
>> +	list_for_each_entry(map, &adapter->maps, list) {
>> +		if (map->guest_addr == parm->nib) {
>> +			found = 1;
>> +			break;
>> +		}
>> +	}
>> +	up_write(&adapter->maps_lock);
> 
> Regardless of which user space interface you ultimately use: I think
> you should leave poking the adapter handling innards to the adapter
> code and instead create and use an interface to look up the mapping
> from the guest address.

Right...
Thanks

Pierre

> 
>> +
>> +	if (!found)
>> +		return 0;
>> +
>> +	nib = (unsigned long) page_address(map->page);
>> +	nib += (map->guest_addr & 0x0fff);
>> +
>> +	return nib;
>> +}
> 


-- 
Pierre Morel
Linux/KVM/QEMU in Böblingen - Germany