linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.9 16/92] mm: dont warn about large allocations for slab

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20181129140107.708486552@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Thu, 29 Nov 2018 15:11:45 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
        syzbot+87829a10073277282ad1@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
        syzbot+ef4e8fc3a06e9019bb40@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
        syzbot+6e438f4036df52cbb863@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
        syzbot+8574471d8734457d98aa@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
        syzbot+af1504df0807a083dbd9@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
        Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 16/92] mm: dont warn about large allocations for slab

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>

commit 61448479a9f2c954cde0cfe778cb6bec5d0a748d upstream.

Slub does not call kmalloc_slab() for sizes > KMALLOC_MAX_CACHE_SIZE,
instead it falls back to kmalloc_large().

For slab KMALLOC_MAX_CACHE_SIZE == KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE and it calls
kmalloc_slab() for all allocations relying on NULL return value for
over-sized allocations.

This inconsistency leads to unwanted warnings from kmalloc_slab() for
over-sized allocations for slab.  Returning NULL for failed allocations is
the expected behavior.

Make slub and slab code consistent by checking size >
KMALLOC_MAX_CACHE_SIZE in slab before calling kmalloc_slab().

While we are here also fix the check in kmalloc_slab().  We should check
against KMALLOC_MAX_CACHE_SIZE rather than KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE.  It all kinda
worked because for slab the constants are the same, and slub always checks
the size against KMALLOC_MAX_CACHE_SIZE before kmalloc_slab().  But if we
get there with size > KMALLOC_MAX_CACHE_SIZE anyhow bad things will
happen.  For example, in case of a newly introduced bug in slub code.

Also move the check in kmalloc_slab() from function entry to the size >
192 case.  This partially compensates for the additional check in slab
code and makes slub code a bit faster (at least theoretically).

Also drop __GFP_NOWARN in the warning check.  This warning means a bug in
slab code itself, user-passed flags have nothing to do with it.

Nothing of this affects slob.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180927171502.226522-1-dvyukov@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Reported-by: syzbot+87829a10073277282ad1@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+ef4e8fc3a06e9019bb40@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+6e438f4036df52cbb863@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+8574471d8734457d98aa@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+af1504df0807a083dbd9@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 mm/slab.c        |    4 ++++
 mm/slab_common.c |   12 ++++++------
 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

--- a/mm/slab.c
+++ b/mm/slab.c
@@ -3690,6 +3690,8 @@ __do_kmalloc_node(size_t size, gfp_t fla
 	struct kmem_cache *cachep;
 	void *ret;

+	if (unlikely(size > KMALLOC_MAX_CACHE_SIZE))
+		return NULL;
 	cachep = kmalloc_slab(size, flags);
 	if (unlikely(ZERO_OR_NULL_PTR(cachep)))
 		return cachep;
@@ -3725,6 +3727,8 @@ static __always_inline void *__do_kmallo
 	struct kmem_cache *cachep;
 	void *ret;

+	if (unlikely(size > KMALLOC_MAX_CACHE_SIZE))
+		return NULL;
 	cachep = kmalloc_slab(size, flags);
 	if (unlikely(ZERO_OR_NULL_PTR(cachep)))
 		return cachep;
--- a/mm/slab_common.c
+++ b/mm/slab_common.c
@@ -883,18 +883,18 @@ struct kmem_cache *kmalloc_slab(size_t s
 {
 	int index;

-	if (unlikely(size > KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE)) {
-		WARN_ON_ONCE(!(flags & __GFP_NOWARN));
-		return NULL;
-	}
-
 	if (size <= 192) {
 		if (!size)
 			return ZERO_SIZE_PTR;

 		index = size_index[size_index_elem(size)];
-	} else
+	} else {
+		if (unlikely(size > KMALLOC_MAX_CACHE_SIZE)) {
+			WARN_ON(1);
+			return NULL;
+		}
 		index = fls(size - 1);
+	}

 #ifdef CONFIG_ZONE_DMA
 	if (unlikely((flags & GFP_DMA)))