[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <308735274.C9ZyqtqOL8@tpdeb>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 23:39:48 +0200
From: Dimitar Dimitrov <dinuxbg@...il.com>
To: Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>
Cc: ohad@...ery.com, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, tony@...mide.com,
robh+dt@...nel.org, bcousson@...libre.com, ssantosh@...nel.org,
s-anna@...com, nsekhar@...com, t-kristo@...com, nsaulnier@...com,
jreeder@...com, m-karicheri2@...com, woods.technical@...il.com,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/16] remoteproc/pru: Add PRU remoteproc driver
On Monday, 12/26/2018, 9:52:37 EET Roger Quadros wrote:
> +/*
> + * Convert PRU device address (instruction space) to kernel virtual address
> + *
> + * A PRU does not have an unified address space. Each PRU has its very own
> + * private Instruction RAM, and its device address is identical to that of
> + * its primary Data RAM device address.
> + */
> +static void *pru_i_da_to_va(struct pru_rproc *pru, u32 da, int len)
> +{
> + u32 offset;
> + void *va = NULL;
> +
> + if (len <= 0)
> + return NULL;
Could you please clear the upper 4 bits the of IRAM device address, in order
to support binutils ELF images? Here is an example line to add here:
+ /* GNU binutils do not support multiple address spaces. The
+ * default linker script from the official GNU pru-ld places
+ * IRAM at an arbitrary high offset, in order to differentiate it
+ * from DRAM. Hence we need to strip the artificial offset
+ * from the IRAM address.
+ */
+ da &= ~0xf0000000u;
+
> +
> + if (da >= pru->iram_da &&
> + da + len <= pru->iram_da + pru->mem_regions[PRU_MEM_IRAM].size {
> + offset = da - pru->iram_da;
> + va = (__force void *)(pru->mem_regions[PRU_MEM_IRAM].va +
> + offset);
> + }
> +
> + return va;
> +}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists