linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 3/7] mm, devm_memremap

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPcyv4iVCMo29SWM2jhnNTZ5ugYaqjeW_LKe9O2YmeNohwQG3A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 30 Nov 2018 14:28:36 -0800
From:   Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To:     Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Maling list - DRI developers 
        <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Stephen Bates <sbates@...thlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 3/7] mm, devm_memremap_pages: Fix shutdown handling

On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 2:19 PM Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com> wrote:
>
> Hey,
>
> On 2018-11-29 11:51 a.m., Dan Williams wrote:
> > Got it, let me see how bad moving arch_remove_memory() turns out,
> > sounds like a decent approach to coordinate multiple users of a single
> > ref.
>
> I've put together a patch set[1] that fixes all the users of
> devm_memremap_pages() without moving arch_remove_memory(). It's pretty
> clean except for the p2pdma case which is fairly tricky but I don't
> think there's an easy way around that.

The solution I'm trying is to introduce a devm_memremap_pages_remove()
that each user can call after they have called percpu_ref_exit(), it's
just crashing for me currently...

> If you come up with a better solution that's great, otherwise let me
> know and I'll do some clean up and more testing and send this set to the
> lists. Though, we might need to wait for your patch to land before we
> can properly send the fix to it (the first patch in my series)...

I'd say go ahead and send it. We can fix p2pdma as a follow-on. Send
it to Andrew as a patch relative to the current -next tree.