[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALxhOniC95bKe5vLvNFdjwrzLa+mWw6hMvzESXG3MkUfVsrOzA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 10:15:48 +0530
From: Firoz Khan <firoz.khan@...aro.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: "open list:RALINK MIPS ARCHITECTURE" <linux-mips@...ux-mips.org>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
Paul Burton <paul.burton@...s.com>,
James Hogan <jhogan@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@...b.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Kate Stewart <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,
y2038 Mailman List <y2038@...ts.linaro.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-Arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@...il.com>,
Marcin Juszkiewicz <marcin.juszkiewicz@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] mips: add __NR_syscalls along with __NR_Linux_syscalls
Hi Arnd,
Thanks for your email.
On Thu, 29 Nov 2018 at 19:41, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 9:44 AM Firoz Khan <firoz.khan@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> > arch/mips/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h | 17 ++++++++++++++---
> > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/mips/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h b/arch/mips/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h
> > index f25dd1d..6914be5 100644
> > --- a/arch/mips/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h
> > +++ b/arch/mips/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h
> > @@ -391,11 +391,14 @@
> > #define __NR_rseq (__NR_Linux + 367)
> > #define __NR_io_pgetevents (__NR_Linux + 368)
> >
> > +#ifdef __KERNEL__
> > +#define __NR_syscalls 368
> > +#endif
> >
> > /*
> > * Offset of the last Linux o32 flavoured syscall
> > */
> > -#define __NR_Linux_syscalls 368
> > +#define __NR_Linux_syscalls __NR_syscalls
>
> This seems odd: you define __NR_Linux_syscalls outside of
> #ifdef __KERNEL__, but the definition only works
> with __NR_syscalls being defined first, which it isn't in
> user space.
>
> Since the macros are completely unused as well as unusable
> now, how about removing them together with the other
> ones removed in patch 2?
Yes, good point, will update asap.
Firoz
>
> Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists