[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <154356563033.88331.4784365644083087914@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 00:13:50 -0800
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>,
David Brown <david.brown@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Marc Gonzalez <marc.w.gonzalez@...e.fr>,
Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] clk: qcom: gcc-msm8998: Disable halt check of UFS clocks
Quoting Bjorn Andersson (2018-11-29 23:27:25)
> On Thu 29 Nov 23:06 PST 2018, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>
> > Quoting Bjorn Andersson (2018-11-29 22:52:58)
> > > Drop the halt check of the UFS symbol clocks, in accordance with other
> > > platforms. This makes clk_disable_unused() happy and makes it possible
> > > to turn the clocks on again without an error.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
> >
> > Someone was supposed to figure out why we needed to SKIP here instead of
> > doing things in the proper order. Is anyone attempting to figure that
> > out?
> >
>
> I'm not aware of any such efforts, but looping in Vivek here.
>
> I would be happy to revert this change in 8996, 8998 and 845 once such
> fix arrives. But as this is needed to make progress on getting UFS up on
> 8998 it would be nice to get it merged for now...
>
That's fine. Just doing my periodic ping on this topic.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists