linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] mach-omap2: handle autoidle denial

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <cb68f26e-aa7e-bf49-df1b-9fad85334efb@ti.com>
Date:   Fri, 30 Nov 2018 11:21:48 +0200
From:   Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>
To:     Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Andreas Kemnade <andreas@...nade.info>,
        <bcousson@...libre.com>, <letux-kernel@...nphoenux.org>,
        <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>, <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        <paul@...an.com>, <tony@...mide.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] mach-omap2: handle autoidle denial

On 30/11/2018 09:57, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Tero Kristo (2018-11-29 23:37:35)
>> On 30/11/2018 02:26, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>> Quoting Andreas Kemnade (2018-11-10 12:31:12)
>>>> On the gta04 with a dm3730 omap_hdq does not work properly when the
>>>> device enters lower power states. Idling uart1 and 2 is enough
>>>> to show up that problem, if there are no other things enabled.
>>>> Further research reveals that hdq iclk must not be turned off during
>>>> transfers, also according to the TRM. That fact is also correctly described
>>>> in the flags but the code to handle that is incomplete.
>>>>
>>>> To handle multiple users of a single ick, autoidle is disabled
>>>> when a user of that ick requires that (has the OCPIF_SWSUP_IDLE))
>>>>
>>>> Changes since v1:
>>>> - uses spinlocks instead of mutexes
>>>> - invert counter logic
>>>> - check whether clock type is basic
>>>>
>>>
>>> I'm expecting someone like Tero or Tony to review this.
>>>
>>
>> Rest of it looks fine to me, except for the discussion under the
>> CLK_IS_BASIC flag, which might trigger a bigger rework of the code.
>>
> 
> Is that a Reviewed-by tag?
> 

Not yet, lets see where discussion ends up with patch #2. :)

-Tero
--
Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki. Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki