[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181130095426.GB17103@infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 01:54:26 -0800
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Dennis Zhou <dennis@...nel.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>, kernel-team@...com,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/13] blkcg: associate blkg when associating a device
> diff --git a/include/linux/bio.h b/include/linux/bio.h
> index 62715a5a4f32..8bc9d9b29fd3 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bio.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bio.h
> @@ -486,6 +486,12 @@ extern unsigned int bvec_nr_vecs(unsigned short idx);
> extern const char *bio_devname(struct bio *bio, char *buffer);
>
> #define bio_set_dev(bio, bdev) \
> +do { \
> + bio_set_dev_only(bio, bdev); \
> + bio_associate_blkg(bio); \
> +} while (0)
> +
> +#define bio_set_dev_only(bio, bdev) \
This lacks any explanation on when you would use bio_set_dev_only or
bio_set_dev. Please document why we need both and why you'd choose or
the other.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists