[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181130121754.GO10650@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 14:17:54 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 09/15] i2c: acpi: Introduce
i2c_acpi_get_i2c_resource() helper
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 02:12:31PM +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 12:49:50PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> >
> > > > Is this something we have to live with or which can be cleaned up
> > > > somewhen?
> > >
> > > My opinion that we might need something like
> > > drivers/acpi/acpi_i2c_lib.c
> > > drivers/acpi/acpi_gpio_lib.c
> > > etc.
> > >
> >
> > Collect all of them in drivers/acpi/acpi_libs.c?
> >
> > > But better to ask Rafael and Mika what they think about this.
>
> IMHO all the bus specific ACPI things should go under those buses (so
> the opposite what is proposed here) but I also don't think any of this
> is show stopper for the patch series under discussion ;-)
Thank you guys for your input, let me fix this later, out of this series.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists