[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181130123027.cyqfi2k34nh2gjmx@pathway.suse.cz>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 13:30:27 +0100
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] printk: don't unconditionally shortcut print_time()
On Fri 2018-11-30 11:26:02, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> Petr Mladek wrote:
> > See syslog_print_all() and kmsg_dump_get_buffer(). They
> > start with calling msg_print_text() many times to calculate
> > how many messages fit into the given buffer. Then they
> > blindly copy the messages into the buffer.
> >
> > Now, the buffer might overflow if the size is calculated
> > with printk_time disabled and the messages are copied with
> > printk_time enabled.
> >
>
> Indeed, SYSLOG_ACTION_READ_ALL case can write more bytes than userspace
> has supplied, resulting in possible memory corruption in userpsace. And
> obtaining a snapshot of printk_time under logbuf_lock won't help, for we
> need to drop logbuf_lock before calling copy_to_user().
>
> > IMHO, passing it as parameter to msg_print_text(), print_prefix(),
> > and print_time() looks acceptable.
>
> Below is a patch for passing a snapshot of printk_time to msg_print_text(),
> but we are still failing to close a race explained at bottom.
The patch looks fine to me.
> The remaining race is that klogctl(SYSLOG_ACTION_SIZE_UNREAD) after klogctl(SYSLOG_ACTION_READ)
> can return negative value upon success, for SYSLOG_ACTION_SIZE_UNREAD depends that printk_time
> did not change (from true to false) after SYSLOG_ACTION_READ updated syslog_partial. To close
> this race, we need to make sure that printk_time is evaluated only once for each record.
> That is, evaluate printk_time upon e.g. log_store() rather than upon msg_print_text().
Great catch!
> kernel/printk/printk.c | 9 ++++++---
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/printk/printk.c b/kernel/printk/printk.c
> index 1b2a029..c692fbc 100644
> --- a/kernel/printk/printk.c
> +++ b/kernel/printk/printk.c
> @@ -421,6 +421,8 @@ __packed __aligned(4)
> static u64 clear_seq;
> static u32 clear_idx;
>
> +static bool printk_time = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PRINTK_TIME);
> +
> #define PREFIX_MAX 32
> #define LOG_LINE_MAX (1024 - PREFIX_MAX)
>
> @@ -620,7 +622,9 @@ static int log_store(int facility, int level,
> msg->facility = facility;
> msg->level = level & 7;
> msg->flags = flags & 0x1f;
> - if (ts_nsec > 0)
> + if (!printk_time)
> + msg->ts_nsec = (u64) -1ULL;
> + else if (ts_nsec > 0)
> msg->ts_nsec = ts_nsec;
> else
> msg->ts_nsec = local_clock();
> @@ -1210,14 +1214,13 @@ static inline void boot_delay_msec(int level)
> }
> #endif
>
> -static bool printk_time = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PRINTK_TIME);
> module_param_named(time, printk_time, bool, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR);
>
> static size_t print_time(u64 ts, char *buf)
> {
> unsigned long rem_nsec;
>
> - if (!printk_time)
> + if (ts == (u64) -1ULL)
Sigh, we need to always store the timestamp. /dev/kmsg prints it
timestamps even when printk.time parameter is disabled.
Instead, we could use one bit in log_flags instead.
But I feel a bit uneasy that we change the semantic and could break
something. For example, SYSLOG_ACTION_READ_ALL callers might want
to have a consistent output (dmesg -Sr). Also we would need to sync
early boot messages with printk.time kernel parameter.
I am not fully happy with the solution passing time parameter.
It is less secure. But it would not break compatibility.
This particular race might be solved the following way:
diff --git a/kernel/printk/printk.c b/kernel/printk/printk.c
index 1b2a029360b7..5b489988e9b7 100644
--- a/kernel/printk/printk.c
+++ b/kernel/printk/printk.c
@@ -1294,6 +1294,7 @@ static size_t msg_print_text(const struct printk_log *msg, bool syslog, char *bu
static int syslog_print(char __user *buf, int size)
{
+ static bool time;
char *text;
struct printk_log *msg;
int len = 0;
@@ -1318,9 +1319,13 @@ static int syslog_print(char __user *buf, int size)
break;
}
+ /* Keep partial line consistent */
+ if (!syslog_partial)
+ time = printk_time;
+
skip = syslog_partial;
msg = log_from_idx(syslog_idx);
- n = msg_print_text(msg, true, text, LOG_LINE_MAX + PREFIX_MAX);
+ n = msg_print_text(msg, true, time, text, LOG_LINE_MAX + PREFIX_MAX);
if (n - syslog_partial <= size) {
/* message fits into buffer, move forward */
syslog_idx = log_next(syslog_idx);
Best Regards,
Petr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists