[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181130125904.GB15388@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 14:59:04 +0200
From: Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, mazziesaccount@...il.com,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>,
David Brown <david.brown@...aro.org>,
Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@...il.com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Huang Shijie <sjhuang@...vatar.ai>,
Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@...omium.org>,
Akshu Agrawal <akshu.agrawal@....com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-soc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/8] clk: clkdev/of_clk - add managed lookup and
provider registrations
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 11:06:53AM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 12:50:22PM +0200, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
> > Hello Stephen,
> >
> > Thanks a bunch for taking the time and reviewing this!
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 12:54:10AM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > > Quoting Matti Vaittinen (2018-11-13 03:55:58)
> > > > With MFD devices the clk properties may be contained in MFD (parent) DT
> > > > node. Current devm_of_clk_add_hw_provider assumes the clk is bound to MFD
> > > > subdevice not to MFD device (parent). Add
> > > > devm_of_clk_add_hw_provider_parent to tackle this issue.
> > > >
> > > > Also clkdev registration lacks of managed registration functions and it
> > > > seems few drivers do not drop clkdev lookups at exit. Add
> > > > devm_clk_hw_register_clkdev and devm_clk_release_clkdev to ease lookup
> > > > releasing at exit.
> > >
> > > Please split this into clkdev and non-clkdev devm functionality.
> > Allright. I'll split this to two patches.
>
> Definitely, please note that clkdev is separate from the common
> clk stuff, and is actually maintained by a different person (me)
> although I currently defer much of the review to the common clk
> guys.
Right. This clarifies how clkdev is maintained. Thanks for letting me
know. Is it still Ok to do these changes through linux-clk tree or is
there some other tree where the devm portion should be submitted? If so,
how should the dependencies be handled?
Br,
Matti Vaittinen
>
> --
> RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
> FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up
> According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up
--
Matti Vaittinen
ROHM Semiconductors
~~~ "I don't think so," said Rene Descartes. Just then, he vanished ~~~
Powered by blists - more mailing lists