[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFqZXNvGwH4rjdTUsiDjScxV5bkPq=gHs4w3TF-cPMBcun1U_A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 16:17:33 +0100
From: Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@...hat.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
selinux@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the selinux tree with the vfs tree
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 4:10 PM David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> wrote:
> Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> > - if (fc->purpose == FS_CONTEXT_FOR_KERNEL_MOUNT)
> > + if (fc->purpose == (FS_CONTEXT_FOR_KERNEL_MOUNT|FS_CONTEXT_FOR_SUBMOUNT))
>
> It's not a bitmask, so you can't do that. You'd need to do:
>
> if (fc->purpose == FS_CONTEXT_FOR_KERNEL_MOUNT ||
> fc->purpose == FS_CONTEXT_FOR_SUBMOUNT)
>
> or use a switch.
Damn, you're right... I should have noticed that there is '==' instead of '&' :/
Thanks,
--
Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace at redhat dot com>
Associate Software Engineer, Security Technologies
Red Hat, Inc.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists