lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 30 Nov 2018 10:19:43 -0800
From:   Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
To:     "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc:     Radoslaw Burny <rburny@...gle.com>,
        Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@...onical.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        jsperbeck@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: Make /proc/sys inodes be owned by global root.

On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 08:48:11AM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org> writes:
> 
> > The logic seems sensible then, but are we implicating what a container
> > does with its sysctl values onto the entire system? If so, sure, it
> > seems you want this for networking purposes as there are a series of
> > sysctl values a container may want to muck with, but are we sure we
> > want the same for *all* sysctl entries?
> 
> No.  Please look at the patch again.  It sets the default uid and gid
> for sysctl entries to 0.  AKA GLOBAL_ROOT_UID and GLOBAL_ROOT_GID
> because there is a bug and they were not set to that value.
> 
> Those are the uids and gids that are tested agasint.  It just happens
> you have to be in a weird configuration for this bug to become a problem.

Thanks, then provided the commit lot is modified:

Acked-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>

  Luis

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ