linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86/umip: Print UMIP line only once

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 30 Nov 2018 12:28:41 -0800
From:   Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/umip: Print UMIP line only once

On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 09:59:36PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
> 
> ... instead of issuing it per CPU and flooding dmesg unnecessarily.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
> Cc: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>

This make sense to me. I also noticed that this message was being
printed when CPUs were put offline and the back online. There was
no need for it.

Thanks and BR,
Ricardo