linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] prctl: add PR_{GET,SET}_KILL_DESCENDANTS_ON

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 30 Nov 2018 20:28:50 -0800
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:     Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc:     j@...ron.ch, "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] prctl: add PR_{GET,SET}_KILL_DESCENDANTS_ON_EXIT

On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 2:33 AM Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On 11/29, Jürg Billeter wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2018-11-29 at 13:34 +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > > So I think the patch is mostly fine, the only problem I can see is that
> > > PR_SET_KILL_DESCENDANTS_ON_EXIT can race with PR_SET_CHILD_SUBREAPER, they both
> > > need to update the bits in the same word.
> >
> > Good point. I'll make it a regular bool instead of a bitfield for v2,
>
> Agreed,

Is it worth doing something for singal_struct like we did for
task_struct with the TASK_PFA_* and atomic_flags?

-- 
Kees Cook