[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGXu5jKmz+zDH9nmYo=dwxWRNh=gYxb--Qy4x+KrFuBaT+L31w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 20:28:50 -0800
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: j@...ron.ch, "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] prctl: add PR_{GET,SET}_KILL_DESCENDANTS_ON_EXIT
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 2:33 AM Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On 11/29, Jürg Billeter wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2018-11-29 at 13:34 +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > > So I think the patch is mostly fine, the only problem I can see is that
> > > PR_SET_KILL_DESCENDANTS_ON_EXIT can race with PR_SET_CHILD_SUBREAPER, they both
> > > need to update the bits in the same word.
> >
> > Good point. I'll make it a regular bool instead of a bitfield for v2,
>
> Agreed,
Is it worth doing something for singal_struct like we did for
task_struct with the TASK_PFA_* and atomic_flags?
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists