lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181201165610.GA20912@lst.de>
Date:   Sat, 1 Dec 2018 17:56:10 +0100
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:     Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>, Guo Ren <ren_guo@...ky.com>,
        Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] dma-direct: provide page based alloc/free helpers

On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 07:04:41PM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 05/11/2018 12:19, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> Some architectures support remapping highmem into DMA coherent
>> allocations.  To use the common code for them we need variants of
>> dma_direct_{alloc,free}_pages that do not use kernel virtual addresses.
>
> FWIW it's as much about non-cacheable remapping of lowmem as it is about 
> highmem. Regardless, the diff looks OK to me.

Yes, but as long as you remap lowmem the current interface work ok,
but once you have highmem a kernel virtual address doesn't cut it,
and we need a page struct or physical address.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ