linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] x86/mm: Drop usage of __flush_tlb_all() in kernel_physical_mapping

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPcyv4hm1yRz9qU35f9ZsCHyAeM6c+cQuipJ02GJk48wTTL00A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 1 Dec 2018 09:49:14 -0800
From:   Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
        stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] x86/mm: Drop usage of __flush_tlb_all() in kernel_physical_mapping_init()

On Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 2:28 AM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 04:35:06PM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> >
> > Dan Williams (5):
> >       generic/pgtable: Make {pmd,pud}_same() unconditionally available
> >       generic/pgtable: Introduce {p4d,pgd}_same()
> >       generic/pgtable: Introduce set_pte_safe()
> >       x86/mm: Validate kernel_physical_mapping_init() pte population
> >       x86/mm: Drop usage of __flush_tlb_all() in kernel_physical_mapping_init()
> >
>
> Since you failed to send me 1,2, only for 3-5:

Whoops, sorry about that, I'll add you to my "auto-cc on all if cc'd
on one" list.

> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>

Thanks.

> although going by the subjects, the earlier two patches should be fine
> too.